The Role of Precision Farming in Swine Production
Dr. Mukesh Kumar Swami1*, Dr. Himanshu Agrawal3, Dr. Dileep Singh1, Dr. Dharam Navadiya1, Dr. Abhishek Singh Tomar1, and Dr. Y.G. Patel2
1M.V.Sc. Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Production Management, 3M.V.Sc. Scholar, Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary Science & A. H., Kamdhenu University, Anand, Gujarat, India
*Corresponding author: drmmukeshswami@gmail.com
Abstract
Precision livestock farming has emerged as a global agriculture business trend. Precision feeding is well known for its ability to cut feed costs, reduce environmental impact and increase animal health and well-being. Prison feeding requires modern multidisciplinary technologies such as information technology, machines and electronics. Such a system comprises automatic troughs that are linked to computer systems that use data received from individual animals (e.g. body weight, feed intake and feeding behaviour) as well as ambient sensors. Precision farming has transformed traditional swine production practices, providing a combination of technology-driven solutions that improve productivity, animal care and environmental sustainability. Farmers may monitor and manage many parts of swine production in real-time by incorporating sophisticated technology like the Internet of Things (IoT), sensors and data analytics. This strategy not only increases operational efficiency but also decreases resource waste and environmental effects. This paper presents an overview of precision farming technologies, their applications in showing production and future prospects stress the industry’s potential for ongoing innovation and important improvement.
Keywords: Precision farming, Sustainability, Technology, Swine, Sensor
Introduction
Precision farming, also known as precision agriculture, has revolutionized the agricultural sector, especially in swine production. By incorporating new technologies and data analysis, it optimizes farming operations, enhancing efficiency, reducing costs, and improving animal welfare. This approach covers various aspects such as feed management and health monitoring, ensuring each pig receives the necessary care to thrive. As the global population is expected to surpass 9 billion by 2050, increasing the demand for livestock products like meat, sustainable intensification through precision livestock farming (PLF) is essential to address food security challenges (Godfray and Garnett, 2014). PLF can significantly boost production by offering more control over factors that traditional farming methods cannot manage. PLF data can alert farmers to deviations in regular patterns, helping prevent negative welfare outcomes. Government entities can also use this data to track and prevent disease outbreaks. According to Berckmans et al. (2017), PLF collects and processes real-time data, providing valuable tools for practitioners, engineers, and technology developers to enhance productivity and profitability in swine production.
Sensors and Animal Recognition: Understanding remote monitoring sensors, algorithm development, and machine learning is essential to realizing the impact of technology on precision livestock production. Remote sensors like cameras, microphones, thermometers, and accelerometers capture data on animal behaviour, health, and environment. Algorithms then process this data, converting it into useful biological insights. For instance, pigs’ lying time helps assess “lameness,” and cough frequency can indicate “respiratory disease.” By linking sensor data with individual animal identification and production data, farmers gain reliable information and alerts on pig welfare, health, and productivity (Berckmans et al., 2017).
IoT and Sensor Technology in Pig Farming: The integration of IoT and sensor technologies is transforming pig farming by enhancing efficiency, sustainability, and animal welfare. Real-time monitoring of barn conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and air quality, helps maintain optimal environments for pigs, while wearable devices track vital signs and movement for early health issue detection. Sensors also monitor feed and water intake, and behaviour patterns, alerting farmers to potential stress or illness, allowing timely interventions for better productivity.
Cameras (2D and 3D)—Behaviour and Physiology: 2D camera sensors require proper lighting and contrasting backgrounds, like a white pig on black cement, for accurate imaging. Cameras like Microsoft Kinect and Intel RealSense use high-definition cameras, infrared illuminators, and time-of-flight (ToF) depth sensors to capture colour images. These images are processed into data on animal activity and distribution, helping track walking patterns, posture, behaviour, and weight. Depth sensors determine animal distance from the camera, and infrared is useful for night-time or low-light monitoring. ToF depth technology measures the time taken for infrared light to return to each pixel, enhancing accuracy in tracking pig movements.
Thermistors and Infrared Imaging—Temperature: Thermistors with data loggers or ear tag sensors provide accurate tissue temperature readings, while infrared technology allows remote, contact-free measurements. Thermal imaging converts heat into colour images, enabling real-time, non-invasive monitoring. Peripheral temperature varies with blood flow, environment, and core body heat. In pigs, areas like behind the ear and breast tissue best reflect core temperature due to minimal insulation.
Microphones—Sound: Microphones can identify and localize sounds related to health monitoring, behaviour, and stress in pigs by converting sound into electrical signals. For instance, vocalizations like “coughs” may indicate respiratory issues. This technology could enable routine health assessments in pig farming.
Accelerometers—Motion Tracking: Wearable accelerometer sensors effectively monitor animal behaviour by measuring static forces, like gravity when a pig is lying down, and dynamic forces during movement. They generate a voltage from movement, allowing them to determine velocity and orientation. A tri-axial accelerometer captures data in three dimensions (x, y, and z) and calculates the tilt angle, providing insights into the animal’s position relative to gravity.
Livestock Identification: When large-scale pig production expands, automated and farmer-friendly animal identification technologies are required for linking animal data to precision livestock farming systems (Banhazi et al., 2012). Individual identification methods that are now employed in the swine industry or research include radio frequency identification, optical character recognition, and facial recognition.
Facial recognition: Facial recognition for pigs, adapted from human identification methods, has shown promising results. Wada achieved 77.0% recognition using frontal images and 97.9% focusing on the eyes. Hansen’s program, using a camera on a water bottle, reached 96.7% accuracy by identifying key areas: the eyes, top of the head, and snout, with a recognition speed of 620 images per second.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) : Optical character recognition (OCR) is a cost-effective method for identifying pigs using painted symbols on ear tags. It employs digital cameras and machine learning for remote identification, though overlapping animals and fading marks can be challenging. OCR can also integrate with farm management software to automate data entry, enhancing efficiency and decision-making.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) : Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology is essential in modern pig farming for animal identification, monitoring, and data management. RFID uses electromagnetic fields to track tags on pigs, linking with farm management systems to enhance operations and animal care. The tags, typically placed in ear tags, contain vital data and communicate wirelessly with RFID readers via radio waves. Low Frequency (LF) RFID is commonly used in electronic sow feeders, providing precise diets while collecting identification data. However, LF-RFID has a limited read range (under 1 meter) and cannot distinguish multiple animals simultaneously. Researchers are exploring Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) RFID for longer-range tracking (3 to 10 meters), but interference from ear tissue can lead to inaccuracies. Other challenges include tag loss, animal stress during tagging, and the need to remove animals for processing.
Benefits of Precision Farming in Swine Production
- Reduces waste, and boosts farm efficiency.
- Automation allows focus on management.
- Real-time monitoring enhances pig well-being.
- Early detection of illness enables timely treatment.
- Lowers emissions, and supports sustainability.
- Improves growth rates and meat yield.
- Reduces waste, promoting environmental sustainability.
- Enhances meat quality and profitability.
Challenges in Implementing Precision Farming in Swine Production
- High initial investment can be prohibitive for small-scale farmers.
- Managing large data volumes from precision farming can be challenging.
- Initial costs may outweigh long-term benefits.
- Integrating new technologies into existing systems can be complex.
- Farmers need training in data management and analysis to benefit effectively.
Future Prospects of Precision Farming in Swine Production
Precision farming in swine production is a significant improvement in agricultural operations, with the potential to improve efficiency, sustainability, and animal welfare. As technology advances, the future possibilities for precision farming in swine production look positive, with numerous important trends and innovations likely to affect the industry.
Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Optimizes resource use (water, feed, energy), minimizing waste and environmental impact.
- Reduces carbon footprint through precise nutrient and waste management, aligning with greenhouse gas reduction goals.
Economic Viability
- Long-term cost savings through waste reduction and optimized resource use.
- Enhances competitiveness by producing higher quality products efficiently.
Global Expansion
- Increases productivity and sustainability in underdeveloped nations, but requires efforts for accessibility.
- Encourages international collaboration to share technology and best practices, raising global standards.
Integration of Advanced Technologies
- AI and machine learning improve predictions and decision-making for health and stress detection.
- Automation of feeding, cleaning, and monitoring reduces labor costs and improves operations, using robotics for health tracking and medication dispensing.
Conclusion
Precision farming in swine production significantly enhances efficiency, sustainability, and animal welfare through technologies like IoT, sensors, and data analytics for real-time monitoring and management. While challenges such as high initial costs and the need for technical skills exist, the long-term benefits include increased productivity and profitability.
Future advancements in AI, machine learning, and robotics promise to further improve the industry’s efficiency and sustainability. Achieving the full potential of precision farming will require ongoing research, development, and global collaboration to sustainably meet the growing demand for pork.
References
Ariff, M. H., Ismarani, I., & Shamsuddin, N. (2014). RFID based systematic livestock health management system. In IEEE Conference on Systems, Process and Control.
Banhazi, T. M., Lehr, H., Black, J. L., Crabtree, H., Schofield, P., Tscharke, M., & Berckmans, D. (2012). Precision Livestock Farming: An international review of scientific and commercial aspects. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng, 5.
Benjamin, M., & Yik, S. (2019). Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: A review for swine practitioners. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 9(4), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040133
Berckmans, D. (2017). General introduction to precision livestock farming. Animal Frontiers, 7(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0102
Förschner, A., Adrion, F., & Gallmann, E. (2018). Practical test and evaluation of optimized UHF ear tags for behavior monitoring of fattening pigs. In Proceedings of the 10 th International Livestock Environment Symposium (ILES X) (pp. 1–8).
Godfray, H. C. J., & Garnett, T. (2014). Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1639), 20120273. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273
Hostetler, C., Stokes, A., & Becton, L. (2018). NATIONAL PORK BOARD Request for Proposals General Call 2018 Writing Research Proposals for the NPB The National Pork Board Is Soliciting Research Proposals Dealing with These Categories.
Kongsro, J. (2014). Estimation of pig weight using a Microsoft Kinect prototype imaging system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 109, 32–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.08.008
Lee, J., Jin, L., Park, D., & Chung, Y. (2016). Automatic recognition of aggressive behavior in pigs using a Kinect depth sensor. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 16(5), 631. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050631
Mittek, M., Psota, E. T., Pérez, L. C., Schmidt, T., & Mote, B. (2016). Health Monitoring of Group-Housed Pigs using Depth-Enabled Multi-Object Tracking. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Pattern Recognition (pp. 24–26).
Mutua, F., Dewey, C., Arimi, S., Schelling, E., & Ogara, W. (2011). Prediction of live body weight using length and girth measurements for pigs in rural Western Kenya. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 19(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.54846/jshap/651
Salles, M. S. V., da Silva, S. C., Salles, F. A., Roma, L. C., Jr, El Faro, L., Bustos Mac Lean, P. A., Lins de Oliveira, C. E., & Martello, L. S. (2016). Mapping the body surface temperature of cattle by infrared thermography. Journal of Thermal Biology, 62, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.10.003
